Why Did This Story Thrive For So Long
Most people like to pass off this story as true with the fact that no
one has ever seen India in an International Football Match. Since no one
actually saw India participate in most international soccer games, this
gave a little credence to the story. (India)
"Another reason this lie could thrive for long was the fact that
credible information was not readily available at our finger tips. It
not like every Emeka, Audu and Ojo could visit Google in a matter of
minutes and tell our ominous fabricators that they should stop spreading
toxic lies."
"And to be honest we have a tingling feeling that this lie was concocted
by an elder of a community because, let’s be honest who questions the
words of the elders in Nigeria."
"Remember, what an adult sees sitting down a child will never see even if he consults Google, Siri or Cortana.
The Element of Truth In This Story
On the 12th of August 1989, Nigeria lost Sam Okwaraji.
Sam Okwaraji was the player rumored to have lost his life in that game
when in truth he died during a FIFA World Cup qualifying game against
Angola in the 77th minute.
He collapsed and died of cognitive heart failure. May his soul rest in Perfect Peace. AMEN
"So that is the only truthful thing about that story, the fact that a Nigerian player died during a football match. That’s it."
"The match was not against India, we did not lose the match and as you must have guessed, and there were no lions either.
What Is The Deal With India Anyway?
India qualified for the 1950 FIFA world cup as a result of the
withdrawal of their scheduled opponents. But the Indian football
governing body, the All India Football Federation (AIFF) decided against
going to the world cup, being unable to understand the importance of
the event at that time.
"Some of the Reasons shown by the AIFF included the cost of travel, lack
of practice time, team selection issued and valuing the Olympics over
the FIFA World cup. It should be noted that FIFA agreed to bear a major
part of the travel expenses, but it did not really help their decision
making."
Was India Banned For Refusing To Play Barefoot?
No.
The 1948 London Olympics was India’s first major international
tournament, where a predominantly barefoot Indian team lost 2 -1 to
France.
Following the 1948 Olympics FIFA imposed a rule banning barefoot play.
The belief that the Indian team refused to play because they were not
allowed to play barefoot is not entirely true according to the then team
captain who said it was just a story to cover the disastrous decision
of the AFIF.
After the 1950 fiasco, India has never come close to qualifying for the World Cup.
The reason you do not see India in World Cup competitions is because they do not qualify
So Does The Indian Team Wear Soccer Boots?
Yes.
In the 1952 Olympics, the Indian team lost 10 – 1 to Yugoslavia (talking
about taking a beating). As a result of this magnanimous defeat the
AIFF made it compulsory for its team members to wear boots
Is it Possible to win a match with a 99 – 1 match margin?
Yes.
It is absolutely possible to rake 99 – 1 from a single football match.
Let’s take a walk down memory lane and see how this is even possible.
Now allow us to digress.
The highest scoring soccer game was 149-0!
You’re probably wondering how a soccer team could be so bad that they
let 149 goals be sccored, but the truth is it was a form of protest. The
event occurred in 2002 after a 2-2 draw between rival teams Stade
Olympique de L’emyrne, or SOE, and AS Adema of Madagascar, which
resulted in the referees awarding a penalty causing SOE to lose the
game.
"During a match fixing debacle in Nigeria, the Feeders scored 72 of
their 79-0 victory in 45 minutes of play. Police Machine sored 61 of
their 67-0 victory in the second half."
:At one point, they scored four goals in a minute."
Arbroath won Bon Accord 36 – 0 in 1885. It held the largest margin of
victory in professional football where both sides wanted to win.
So, yes, given the “right circumstances”, a team could actually receive 99 – 1 beating without any black magic whatsoever
No comments:
Post a Comment