September
2015 marked the 70th Anniversary of the United Nations. The UN was
formed following the Atlantic Charter of 1941 and the Yelta Conference
of 1945. The UN Charter was later proclaimed on 26th June 1945, after
which the month of September of every year was set aside to mark the
birth of the world’s Confederated Body. The United Nations has its
origin
traced to the Roman Empire, destroyed by its 30 years civil war
of 1618-1648. The Roman Empire was replaced by the Holy Alliance, which
ended in 1818 and was replaced by the Concert of Europe that lasted till
1919 when the League of Nations was formed, courtesy ofWoodrow Wilson’s
Four Solutions strategy to ensure world peace and security, which
included human rights. The League of Nations collapsed in 1945 leading
to the formation of the United Nations same year. The League of Nations
was formally wound up in 1946.
The major aim of the United Nations is
to ensure world peace and security and the two greatest achievements of
theInternational World Body are prevention of another world war and
drastic reduction in inter-State warfare courtesy of the collapse of the
Soviet bloc and cold-war in 1989 (dismantling of Berlin Wall) and 1991
(collapse of the Soviet Union & its radical Marxist-Leninist
political ideology). These great achievements are solely responsible for
the continued survival of the United Nations leading to its recent 70th
birthday.
However, the greatest threat facing the
United Nations that is steadily threatening its existence and global
relevance and importance is the emergence in early 90s of intra-State
warfare or violent conflicts within and without borders. Presently,
there are 64 active intra-State conflicts raging around the world
involving 591 internal armed groups (warsintheworld.com November
2014) in over 60, out of 193 Member-States of the United Nations;
mostly in Africa and Middle East, which include some former members of
the defunct Soviet Union or the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics,
founded on 30th December 1922 and dissolved on 26th December 1991. Of
this number, about 27 or more African countries are affected out of its
53 Member-States (AU); involving 167 internal armed groups or armed
opposition groups. The referenced 64 active intra-State violent
conflicts have also produced 59.4 million refugees around the world as
at 2014 (United Nations High Commission for Refugees Report 18th June
2015).
One of the intra-State violent conflicts
threatening not only world peace, but also showing imminence of the
third world waris the Syrian violent conflict that started in March 2011
over repressive and sit-tight governing styles of President Bashar
al-Assad, who succeeded his late father, Hafez al-Assad in 2000, after
his father had ruled Syria for 30 years (1970-2000). The violent
conflict has claimed over 210,000 lives in a period of less than five
years according to UN and the Syrian Observatory for Human Rights and
displaced 7.6 million (IDPs) and produced 3.88 million refugees (UN High
Commission for Refugees Report, 18th June 2015). The saddest of it all
is that the violent conflict has no end in sight and is getting more
complicated as days go by. All the elements of Agenda for Peace theory
of 1992 of Dr. Boutros, Boutros Ghali (then UN Secretary General),
designed for Peace Operations in conflict situations which include peace
enforcement operation, peacekeeping, peacemaking, conflict prevention
and peace-building, all appeared to have failed woefully in the
management of the Syrian violent conflict.
The most shocking part of it all is the
ongoing show of military muscles and power play by the world military
super powers and their allies. What looks like resurgence of Soviet
Socialist and Europe/US Capitalist military power game or gun power
altercation are playing out in the devastated country (Syria). Already,
millions of Syrian refugees have left and are still leaving Syria in
droves or torrents; thereby over-stretching the social, economic and
humanitarian capacities of their host countries including some members
of former Western and Eastern Europe that had responded by earmarking
billions of dollars to quarter them.
In the said Syrian violent conflict, all
kinds of formal and informal warfare including terrorism (including
chemical, biological and cyber terrorism), revolution, guerrilla,
asymmetric, insurgency and stationary (artillery) warfare strategieshave
been massively deployed by all parties to the conflict. In all these,
the weaknesses and incapacities of the United Nations particularly its
Security Council; have become manifest. The UN Security Council is so
divided and incoherent that it could not enforce peace and security in
Syria using its powerful Articles Six and Seven given to it by the
United Nations and its Charter.
Our greatest concern and worry,
therefore, are the unfolding events in the country involving Russia,
China, Iraq, Lebanon, Iran and Syria itself, tagged Pro-Assad; and
United States, United Kingdom, France, Australia, Saudi Arabia, Qatar,
Belgium, Canada, Jordan, Netherlands, Denmark and Turkey, tagged the
Coalition as well as the so called Islamic State in Iraq and Syria
(ISIS), which maintains over 60,000 fighters in Syria and Iraq armed
with tanks, armored personnel carriers, Chinese rockets, Russian RPGs,
AK-47 assault rifles and PKM machine guns. There are also armed
opposition groups backed and trained by the United States and its
western allies seeking violently to oust the despotic Bashar al-Assad
regime.
Far above war of words between the West
and the Russia and its allied China over Syria and its despotic Bashar
Assad leadership, the Syrian airspace is increasingly congested and
imminence of crash of warplanes, drones, helicopters, missiles and
artillery between the two renewed antagonistic blocs is becoming a
reality day in day out. Russia says it has successfully carried out 55
hits on ISIS targets; while USA said it has recorded 24 attacks on ISIS
targets. The armed opposition groups have also disputed the Russian
claims and claimed that Russia was hitting its camps for the purpose of
crippling its advances against the despotic Assad regime. And if such
claims are found to be true, then they have the capacity of igniting
direct military confrontations between the two most powerful military
blocs, which can snowball into “a third world war”.
Another clear trigger of a possible
third world war stems from the amount of military traffic in the Syrian
airspace, which can lead to war planes of either side being shot down by
default or mischievous intents. Already, reports have it that some US
war planes flying over Syria had to abandon targets and even bend
sharply to avoid Russian jets. “In one terrifying close call, Lt Gen
Charles Brown, Commander of the American air campaign in Syria, said US
and Russian planes came within just 20 miles of each other – which, at
the speeds they travel, is as little as 30 seconds from a disastrous
impact” (UK Mirror Newspaper, 11th October 2015). All known heavy and
light weapons of modern warfare except nuclear weapons, are also
deployed and being used by all parties to the Syrian violent conflict.
While it is true that the United Nations
has lasted 44 years more than the League of Nations (26 years), it is
also true that failure to critically address frontal challenges facing
it at 70 can also lead to its collapse at 70. Of all the challenges
facing the United Nations that of restructuring is the greatest of all.
Permanent membership of the Security Council and its numerical strength
must be revisited, redefined and expanded. For instance, the number of
permanent membership of the Security Council must be increased on the
basis of equality of Member-States and Continent or Region with strict
criteria for qualification and membership including improved human
rights, economic, electoral or political, diplomatic and military
records or capacities. The veto power system of the Security Council
members must be abolished and replaced with simple or two thirds
majority. The essence of the foregoing is to make the tasks of the
Security Council as enshrined in Articles Six and Seven of the UN
Charter easily enforceable in the event of escalation of hostilities
such as the precarious situation in Syria.
There is also need for the UN to
restructure its Establishment Charter and all its organs and agencies so
as to bring them in conformity with modern realities including the
ravaging effects of intra-State violent conflicts. To this end, the UN
must set an international standard (Declaration) with respect to
municipal electoral processes and tenures of office of elected
presidents or prime ministers. Our findings have indisputably revealed
that most of intra-State violent conflicts ravaging over 60
Member-States of UN are as a result of presence of personal and
structural violence powered by extra constitutional or elongation of
office tenures as well as institutionalization of politics of exclusion
and segregation (structural imbalances). The standard must also be made
diplomatically sanctionable including peace & security enforcement
operations (i.e. human and material embargoes, sanctions and military
options) against defiant or defaulting head of any Member-State of UN.
Finally, Intersociety is of firm opinion
that there are ominous signs that third world war is in the offing
unless the United Nations wakes up from its slumber and does that which
is popularly and internationally upright, among which exhaustively
mentioned above. The UN must avoid grave mistakes that led to the
collapse of the League of Nations in 1945. The antagonist and
protagonist parties in the Syrian violent conflict particularly the
Russia and China on one part and US and key EU countries on the other
part, must act with restraint and avoid plunging the world into an
armada of intractable human tragedies using Syria as experimenting
ground.
Signed:
Emeka Umeagbalasi, Board Chairman
International Society for Civil Liberties & the Rule of Law (www.intersociety-ng.org)
No comments:
Post a Comment